microsoft / microsoft/RulesEngine
Why not to combine it with `powerfx`?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C#
- Stars
- 4.4k
- Forks
- 616
- Avg merge
- 6m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
The expression is only work with lambda now, whitch need some C# programing knowledge, and it not friendly for a normal maintainer. so why not to provide a low-code way via powerfx?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the current lambda-based expression path and how RulesEngine evaluates expressions, then assess the requested Power Fx integration. Done would be a maintainer-approved design and implementation scope for a low-code Power Fx option, with compatibility and validation criteria documented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- csharp
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100