microsoft / microsoft/Qcodes

Running the code on a server by default

Open
#123 4 comments 2 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

discussion
Dominant language
Python
Stars
459
Forks
359
Avg merge
3d 6h
Merged PRs (30d)
73

Description

I don't speak computer completely fluently but yesterday we had a bar discussion about how to run a single experiment with several computers, for example one for each ATS card one has. I agree, this sounds cumbersome but if the software was written by default to run as a server and the user interactions (function calls, scripts etc.) would be send to it, then one could run an experiment on two computers where one just passes function calls on to the other. This wouldn't necessarily be noticed by the user with a single computer, but opens up some nice possibilities. For our multi qubit experiments this might be a nice solution sometimes. Also, one could measure remotely without using TeamViewer. Data could be both sent back and stored on the measurement computer. In many cases, the fridges have a second computer that could run qcodes. Ultimately a remote computer running qcodes would not be so different from any other piece of hardware in our setups.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by tracing how Qcodes currently runs experiments and communicates with hardware, then clarify the server/client boundary, supported remote interactions, and data flow. Done would require an agreed design and implementation scope for running experiments across computers.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
backend-api-design, distributed-systems
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.