microsoft / microsoft/OmniParser
I send it in the Demo.ipynb code first, the ID of the text tags and the PARSED_CONTENT_LIST is inconsistent.
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 25.4k
- Forks
- 2.2k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I found that the digital labels on the picture and the index of the PARED_CONTENT_LIST can be corresponding. It's just that the two are different. For example, the text of the digital label 12 is DOG, and the index in the PARSED_CONATENT_LIST is the confnt of 12. But Bbox's coordinates are consistent.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start in Demo.ipynb and trace how the digital label IDs are matched to PARSED_CONTENT_LIST and Bbox coordinates. Reproduce the reported label 12/DOG example, then verify that the displayed text, list entry, and bounding-box mapping remain consistent.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- jupyter-notebook
- Domain
- computer-vision
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100