microsoft / microsoft/MoGe

MoGe-2 provided models / weights does not have clear license mentioned.

Open
#98 2 comments 8 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
JavaScript
Stars
3k
Forks
234
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

The repo has MIT and Apache 2.0 licenses, but no clear mention of the provided model weights are of which license.
Links in the repo point to the Huggingface where model.pt is located. On Hugging Face, the license is MIT.

I would like to use MoGe in a commercial scenario and would love to know which license the model weights fall under.

Image

The DepthAnything V2 clearly mentions that small model is under Apache-2.0 and rest are CC-By-NC-4.0
It would be great if you can also clearly state the licenses of the model weights.

Image

Thank you for your time and great work <3

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by checking the repository links to the Hugging Face location containing model.pt and compare the hosted license metadata with the repository's MIT and Apache-2.0 notices. Done means the applicable license for the provided model weights is confirmed and stated clearly in the repository documentation, including any distinction between weight variants.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
huggingface
Domain
documentation, machine-learning
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
55/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.