microsoft / microsoft/MoGe

Have you considered motion compensation of dynamic objects?

Open
#90 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
JavaScript
Stars
3k
Forks
234
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Have you considered compensating the motion of dynamic objects in Lidar points with object tracking and speed estimation?
For sequential point clouds, that may be a practical way to reduce the time synchronization problem.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No files, tests, or entry points are identified. Start by clarifying whether sequential LiDAR point clouds and object tracking are within MoGe's scope, then define the required motion compensation, tracking, and speed-estimation behavior. Done would require an agreed design and implementation criteria.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
javascript
Domain
computer-vision
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.