Verify evals on Papers with Code

Hi,

Niels here from the open-source team at Hugging Face.

I've made the following papers and their evaluation results available on Papers with Code:

• MoGe-2: Accurate Monocular Geometry with Metric Scale and Sharp Details — 15 paper-native evaluations.
• MoGe-3: Fine-Detail Monocular Geometry Estimation with Self-Guided Sparse Volumetric Refinement — 8 paper-native evaluations.

The MoGe-3 (ViT-G) results currently rank first on DIODE (relative), ETH3D (relative), KITTI (relative), and Sintel (relative).

Would it be possible to verify these results and let me know if any score, model name, benchmark protocol, or openness metadata should be corrected?

You can also edit the task, methods, project page, and GitHub URL directly from each paper page using your Hugging Face account.

If you'd like to showcase the results in your repository README, you can copy these live leaderboard badges (or use the “Copy PwC badge” button in the Results section):

Kind regards,

Niels

Start with the Papers with Code pages for MoGe-2 and MoGe-3 linked in the issue, then review the listed evaluation results and leaderboard entries. Verify the score, model name, benchmark protocol, and openness metadata against the papers and project information. Done means reporting any corrections needed or confirming that the entries are accurate.