[Question] Normal map: v3 vs v2
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 3k
- Forks
- 234
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Thank you for this great work. After trying it out, I found that
- the normal mapping of $\textcolor{red}{\text{moge-3-vitl is not as good as that of moge-2-vitl-normal}}$.
- Is this because $\textcolor{green}{\text{moge-2-vitl-normal is specifically trained on the normal mapping?}}$
If so, do you have plans to open up the weights of moge-3-vitl-normal?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are identified in the issue. First clarify whether the request concerns documentation of the two models or release of moge-3-vitl-normal weights; the work is complete only when that request has a defined project response or implementation scope.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- computer-vision, machine-learning
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100