Question about the evaluation of point map estimation.
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 3k
- Forks
- 234
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Thank you for your interesting work.
I am not familiar with the direction of point map estimation. I have read Section 4.1 in your paper for quantitative evaluations. But I still do not understand how to align the predicted point map with the GT point map before calculating the point error.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with Section 4.1 of the paper, which the issue identifies as the source of the quantitative evaluation details. Clarify how the predicted point map is aligned with the ground-truth point map before point error is calculated; done means the evaluation procedure is understandable without further explanation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- computer-vision, machine-learning
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100