Question about the definition of Rj
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 3k
- Forks
- 234
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hi, thanks for the great work on MoGe.
I noticed that in the paper (Eq. 5), the radius is defined as
but in the loss.py Rj seems to be defined differently.
Could you please clarify whether this difference is ?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Compare the radius definition in Eq. 5 of the paper with the Rj calculation in loss.py, starting with the relevant loss implementation and paper context. Clarify whether the expressions differ intentionally and document the explanation in the issue or project documentation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- computer-vision, machine-learning
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100