microsoft / microsoft/MoGe

Why is Moge's detail geometry so good? Does its detail geometry originate from the Affine-invariant point map or the Multi-scale local geometry loss?

Open
#107 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
JavaScript
Stars
3k
Forks
234
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Why is Moge's detail geometry so good? Does its detail geometry originate from the Affine-invariant point map or the Multi-scale local geometry loss? For example, in an autonomous driving scenario, in a large-scale scene, the quality of the local cars is very consistent.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reading the repository material describing the Affine-invariant point map and Multi-scale local geometry loss. Compare their stated roles in producing consistent local geometry, then document which component or interaction best explains the large-scale autonomous-driving example; the issue provides no file or test to run.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
computer-vision, machine-learning
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.