microsoft / microsoft/LLMLingua
[Question]: Difficulty Reproducing Results in CoT.ipynb
@iofu728 is already working on this.
Since Mar 28, 2024.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 6.7k
- Forks
- 428
- Avg merge
- 2d 4h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Describe the issue
I attempted to reproduce the results of the LLMLingua paper using the CoT.ipynb notebook from the examples folder. However, I encountered a discrepancy in the accuracy achieved. The result in CoT.ipynb reports 78% accuracy, but I only achieved 68% accuracy in my reproduction attempt.
Changes made to CoT.ipynb:
- Updated the openai library to 1.14.2
- Changed the "completions" API endpoint to "chat.completions".
The rest of the file was kept unchanged as per the GitHub version.
Expected Behavior:
The reproduction should yield results consistent with the reported 78% accuracy, as in the output of the last cell in the notebook:
num_q 1319 correct 1032 ratio 0.7824
Actual Behavior:
I obtained only 68% accuracy:
num_q 1319 correct 900 ratio 0.6823
Question
Is this expected? Any ideas what could be the problem here? If the culprit is the openai model used, any ideas how to fix this -- gpt-3.5 model family no longer allow non-chat inference...
Thanks in advance!
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.