Point cloud from depth
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 397
- Forks
- 34
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hey! Thanks for this amazing work!
How can I get 3D point cloud from depth?
I know intrinsics of a camera and when I project pixels based on intrinsics and predicted depth(not inverse) I get a flat point cloud.
In your paper there is information how to get 2.5D point cloud, but this information isn't clear for me.
What does "reasonable guess of a range" phrase mean?
Thanks!
Below some examples of generated 3D point cloud from samples of Nersemble Dataset.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue does not name a source file, test, or implementation entry point. Start by reading the paper's 2.5D point-cloud section and the project's depth-processing documentation or examples, then determine whether the requested clarification belongs in the documentation. Done means explaining how predicted depth and camera intrinsics produce a 3D point cloud and clarifying the phrase "reasonable guess of a range."
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- computer-vision
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100