Please consider rewording section about 100B training tokens
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 40.3k
- Forks
- 3.7k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
It has become a yearly rite of passage for engagement farming accounts to misinterpret this section
Training tokens != parameter size. There is no 100B model, only 100B training tokens. Please fix
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No file is named; locate the section discussing 100B training tokens and read its surrounding wording. Clarify that 100B refers to training tokens rather than model parameter size, then verify the revised text makes that distinction unambiguous.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100