microsoft / microsoft/Analysis-Services
BPA for Copilot
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C#
- Stars
- 732
- Forks
- 433
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
With power bi copilot being introduced, can we add some BPA rules catering to it? Because we advocate to keep the names clean and descriptive. However, many models use abbreviations and names that are not copilot friendly. Request to introduce a new rule that recommends using proper names whenever it detects a name that is not descriptive (similar to a rule where we recommend camel case).
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no files, tests, or existing rule entry point. Start by locating the BPA rule definitions and the existing camel-case naming rule, then clarify measurable criteria for a non-descriptive name and how the new rule should be tested.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- csharp
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100