2994 Attribution and Claim Discussion

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Opening this separately as the main issue thread has become quite noisy and to help move the process forward.

My PR set #3359, #3360, #3361 has been proven working both in my own testing and by @unpluggederan's [thorough testing](https://github.com/microg/GmsCore/issues/2994#issuecomment-4390002020).

At this point, @unpluggederan has suggested that attribution/payment can be discussed separately from the remaining code review and polish.

From what @omarsoufiane told me, the platform process works through approval emails sent to bounty contributors when a claim is submitted.

Are there any concrete contributions people believe should be considered for this claim?

Mentioning relevant people:
@mar-v-in
@unpluggederan
@malsatin
@azhao12345
@omarsoufiane

Recording of my local test

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b225ee32-3f90-4dc5-b954-3f0990622c89

[CI build for reference](https://github.com/opstic/GmsCore/actions/runs/26002196432), please install as a system app and turn everything on.

This is intended as a bounty attribution thread, not a microG issue report.

Start by reviewing PRs #3359, #3360, and #3361 together with the linked CI build and testing evidence. The thread is complete when the relevant contributions are identified and the bounty attribution claim has a clear decision; it does not define a code change to implement.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.