microg / microg/GmsCore

Craft locally signed SafetyNet responses

Open
#301 3 comments 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

🔒 Integrity enhancement
Dominant language
Java
Stars
14.6k
Forks
3.2k
Avg merge
12d 11h
Merged PRs (30d)
4

Description

Won't work with most apps, but probably still worth it. As mentioned in #299

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

The issue names no files or tests; start by reading issue #299 and the surrounding SafetyNet implementation to determine the relevant entry point. Define what locally signed responses must support and how success would be verified before attempting the feature.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
android, java
Domain
mobile-dev, security
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.