Unify personal search and organise projects and deliverables
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 434
- Forks
- 21
- Avg merge
- 18m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 326
Description
Priority: P1 (build on the foundation).
Useful information is scattered across conversations and services. The user needs to find it and turn it into durable work.
Acceptance criteria
- Search owned mail, calendar, notes, documents, files, bookmarks, conversations and completed tasks through one assistant entry point.
- Return source links, dates and permission-scoped excerpts; state when a source is unavailable or stale.
- Group related conversations, people, files, decisions and tasks into a project without duplicating their records.
- Turn a conversation into a note, document or confirmed task and preserve its source connection.
- Create reusable deliverables with discoverable names, versions and links instead of burying the only copy in chat.
- Evaluate retrieval with realistic exact and semantic questions and cross-account/deleted-source tests; add embeddings only if measured gaps justify them.
Dependencies and boundaries
Build on #1472 for indexing rather than duplicate its work. Related #1443 and #1458.
Implementation approach
Audit current main first: some foundations and recent fixes already exist. Close remaining user-visible gaps and preserve working behaviour. This issue records the personal-assistant product backlog, not a claim that every underlying capability is absent. Add focused regression coverage for the behaviour changed.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by auditing the current main branch and the indexing foundation from #1472; also review related issues #1443 and #1458. Map which acceptance criteria already work, then focus on one remaining user-visible gap and add regression coverage for the changed behavior, including relevant retrieval and source-availability cases.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go
- Domain
- ai, search
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100