Suggestion: Add Review process documentation

Often there’s variations of ways to do a review based on the PR submitted. For instance for docs you’ll just look at the delta.

For tests you run tests locally and for views you test a component directly.

Maybe it would be nice to write a small document that describes different types of review?

The issue does not name a file, test, or documentation entry point. First inspect the repository's existing contributor and review guidance, then define a small document covering review approaches for documentation changes, tests, and views; done means the guidance is added in an appropriate location and is clear enough for contributors to follow.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.