with x <- 1 do :ok else _ -> ;r end

Type: mismatch
Context: with_else_body

Code:
```elixir
with x <- 1 do :ok else _ ->
;r end
```

Elixir AST:
```elixir
{:with,
[do: [line: 1, column: 13], end: [line: 2, column: 4], line: 1, column: 1],
[
{:<-, [line: 1, column: 8], [{:x, [line: 1, column: 6], nil}, 1]},
[
do: :ok,
else: [
{:->, [newlines: 1, line: 1, column: 27],
[
[{:_, [line: 1, column: 25], nil}],
{:__block__, [], [nil, {:r, [line: 2, column: 2], nil}]}
]}
]
]
]}
```

Spitfire AST:
```elixir
{:with,
[do: [line: 1, column: 13], end: [line: 2, column: 4], line: 1, column: 1],
[
{:<-, [line: 1, column: 8], [{:x, [line: 1, column: 6], nil}, 1]},
[
do: :ok,
else: [
{:->, [newlines: 1, line: 1, column: 27],
[[{:_, [line: 1, column: 25], nil}], {:r, [line: 2, column: 2], nil}]}
]
]
]}
```

Start by comparing the Elixir and Spitfire ASTs for the with_else_body example, focusing on the else clause body and its handling of the newline. Done means Spitfire produces the same AST structure as Elixir for this input; add or run the relevant parser regression test if one exists.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.