Update: PWCG
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
upgrades
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 23
- Forks
- 33
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
- check tests
- node labeling
- consistent draw method, ax
- what if there are no h2h comparisons?
- win:loss instead if wins-lloss?
- h2h instead of pwcg?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the PWCG implementation and its tests, then review the current node labeling, draw method, and handling of missing head-to-head comparisons. Clarify the intended naming and win-loss terminology before changing anything; done should mean the agreed behavior is implemented and the relevant tests pass.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- data-visualization
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100