mgedmin / mgedmin/profilehooks

Maybe use coverage package?

Open
#17 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
enhancement
Dominant language
Python
Stars
338
Forks
29
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

As the original trace.py author, I'm flattered that you are using it under the covers, but I'm also mildly surprised you've not moved on to Ned Batchelder's coverage package. I don't know the details of either package, so maybe you've deemed it not a big enough gain to use.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

Start by reading trace.py and comparing its current role with Ned Batchelder's coverage package. The issue does not specify a target behavior or acceptance criteria, so first establish whether coverage can replace the existing implementation and what completion would mean.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
devtools
Issue type
Refactor
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.