metosin / metosin/testit

Remove the documentation string from facts?

Open
#3 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Clojure
Stars
45
Forks
6
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Is the documentation string needed? there is always the `testing` from `clojure.test` than can be used for that. There would be less syntax to learn & simpler code.

What do you think?

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Review the proposal to remove documentation strings from facts and rely on `testing` from `clojure.test`. Before starting, determine whether this design change is wanted; done would mean an agreed approach with updated behavior and tests, but the issue names no files or tests.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
clojure
Domain
testing
Issue type
Refactor
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.