meshery / meshery/meshery-operator

Modify Meshery Operator's behaviour to provide intelligent networking abstractions

Open
#331 10 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

help wanted issue/design required issue/remind issue/willfix kind/enhancement
Dominant language
Go
Stars
151
Forks
127
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Current Behavior

Users of Meshery bump into some networking issues with meshery-broker(the pub-sub communication platform for meshery). One such example is Minikube which does not have a default load-balancer implementation.

Desired Behavior
  1. Make Meshery Operator self-discovering and self-reporting its static configuration to Meshery Server.
  2. Make Meshery Operator / Meshery Server intelligent enough to change networking based on what it thinks networking should be, but always allow for manual user override.

Contributor Guides and Resources

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reproducing the meshery-broker networking issue on Minikube and tracing how the Meshery Operator and Meshery Server currently exchange static configuration. Define the discovery and reporting scope, networking decisions, and manual override behavior before implementation. Done means Minikube networking works through an explicit, tested abstraction without removing user control.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
go, kubernetes
Domain
infrastructure, networking
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.