max-mapper / max-mapper/request-for-awesome
Oversight / Transparency
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 2
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Would you add a section that describes how this initiative will prevent the cronyism/etc. that the led to the current 'mongous procurement process?
I think you could make an argument that greater transparency (and disclosure/conflict-of-interest requirements) would help prevent these things.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Read the existing report and identify where an oversight or transparency section would fit. Define the section's coverage around transparency, disclosure, and conflict-of-interest requirements, then confirm the report clearly explains how those measures address cronyism and procurement concerns.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100