mattn / mattn/mruby-uv

Benchmarks

Open
#56 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
C
Stars
92
Forks
25
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Hello,

I've been curious about the performance of mruby-uv. I know luvit is much quicker than nodejs and I'm curious how this compares to the two. Also curious how this stacks up agains ngx_mruby ( ngx_mruby/issues#102 ).

There is a great benchmark called http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/. A similar benchmark for nodejs and openresty does exist.

Have you tried to implement a benchmark for this?
Anything about mruby-uv that would make this difficult to implement?

Thanks.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reviewing the TechEmpower FrameworkBenchmarks implementations linked for nodejs and openresty, then inspect the mruby-uv interface to identify how a comparable benchmark could be integrated. The issue names no repository files or tests; done would mean a reproducible benchmark for mruby-uv with results comparable to the referenced implementations.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
c, ruby
Domain
performance
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.