Small simplification
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 2k
- Forks
- 67
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
The following code
if isNil(a) || isNil(b) {
is.logf("%s != %s", is.valWithType(a), is.valWithType(b))
} else if reflect.ValueOf(a).Type() == reflect.ValueOf(b).Type() {
is.logf("%v != %v", a, b)
} else {
is.logf("%s != %s", is.valWithType(a), is.valWithType(b))
}
can be simplified to
if isNil(a) || isNil(b) || reflect.ValueOf(a).Type() != reflect.ValueOf(b).Type() {
is.logf("%s != %s", is.valWithType(a), is.valWithType(b))
} else {
is.logf("%v != %v", a, b)
}
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Open is.go at lines 153-159 and compare the current conditional with the proposed simplification. Run the repository's Go tests and confirm the refactor preserves the existing behavior and output.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go
- Domain
- testing-qa
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100