Chrome as browser family

Nobody has claimed this yet.

`$browserFamilies` variable has this family in it:
```
'Chrome' => [
'1B', '2B', '7S', 'A0', 'AC', 'A4', 'AE', 'AH', 'AI',
'AO', 'AS', 'BA', 'BM', 'BR', 'C2', 'C3', 'C5', 'C4',
'C6', 'CC', 'CD', 'CE', 'CF', 'CG', 'CH', 'CI', 'CL',
'CM', 'CN', 'CP', 'CR', 'CV', 'CW', 'DA', 'DD', 'DG',
'DR', 'EC', 'EE', 'EU', 'EW', 'FA', 'FS', 'GB', 'GI',
'H2', 'HA', 'HE', 'HH', 'HS', 'I3', 'IR', 'JB', 'KN',
'KW', 'LF', 'LL', 'LO', 'M1', 'MA', 'MD', 'MR', 'MS',
'MT', 'MZ', 'NM', 'NR', 'O0', 'O2', 'O3', 'OC', 'PB',
'PT', 'QU', 'QW', 'RM', 'S4', 'S6', 'S8', 'S9', 'SB',
'SG', 'SS', 'SU', 'SV', 'SW', 'SY', 'SZ', 'T1', 'TA',
'TB', 'TG', 'TR', 'TS', 'TU', 'TV', 'UB', 'UR', 'VE',
'VG', 'VI', 'VM', 'WP', 'WH', 'XV', 'YJ', 'YN', 'FH',
'B1', 'BO', 'HB', 'PC', 'LA', 'LT', 'PD', 'HR', 'HU',
'HP', 'IO', 'TP', 'CJ', 'HQ', 'HI', 'PN', 'BW', 'YO',
'DC', 'G8', 'DT', 'AP', 'AK', 'UI', 'SD', 'VN', '4S',
'2S', 'RF', 'LR', 'SQ', 'BV', 'L1', 'F0', 'KS', 'V0',
'C8', 'AZ', 'MM', 'BT', 'N0', 'P0', 'F3', 'VS', 'DU',
'D0', 'P1', 'O4', '8S', 'H3', 'TE', 'WB', 'K1', 'P2',
'XO', 'U0', 'B0', 'VA', 'X0', 'NX', 'O5', 'R1', 'I1',
'HO', 'A5', 'X1', '18', 'B5', 'B6', 'TC', 'A6', '2X',
'F4', 'YG', 'WR', 'NA', 'DM', '1M', 'A7', 'XN', 'XT',
'XB', 'W1', 'HT', 'B8', 'F5', 'B9', 'WA', 'T0', 'HC',
'O6', 'P7', 'LJ', 'LC', 'O7', 'N2', 'A8', 'P8',
],
```
Should not this be `Chromium`, since `Chrome` is a specific clsoed-code browser, while `Chromium` is the open-source browser, which is used by all those other browsers.

I am fine with creating PR for correction, but I think this warrants proper discussion first.

Start by locating the `$browserFamilies` definition and reviewing how its family names are consumed. Read the existing discussion before deciding whether the listed identifiers should remain under Chrome or use Chromium; done means reaching a clear naming decision and updating the affected classification consistently.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.