matloff / matloff/R-vs.-Python-for-Data-Science
TechRepublic
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 448
- Forks
- 40
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
A "journalist" on TechRepublic has basically copypastad your article and added a liberal sprinking of "wrote Matloff" to make this mess:
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/r-vs-python-which-is-a-better-programming-language-for-data-science/
enjoy....
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue points to the TechRepublic article at the linked URL and alleges that it copied the project’s article. Compare the two articles first, then clarify what repository change or resolution is expected; no file, test, or concrete completion condition is named.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python, r
- Domain
- content
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 10/100