matiasandina / matiasandina/uid_python_api
Evaluate per-channel square overrides with shared defaults
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 1
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Summary
As of 2026-04-15, the runtime supports per-channel current_ma in stimulus.channels, but the remaining square/sequence parameters still come from the shared stimulus.square block.
This follow-up is intentionally design-only for now. We are not implementing it immediately.
Goal
Evaluate whether the config should support per-channel square overrides while retaining stimulus.square as shared defaults.
Example target shape:
stimulus:
channels:
ch1:
index: 1
current_ma: 50
period_ms: 200
time_on_ms: 10
ch2:
index: 2
current_ma: 30
period_ms: 100
time_on_ms: 5
square:
nb_of_seq: 65535
nb_of_pulses_per_seq: 20
starting_delay_ms: 0
delay_between_seq_ms: 3000
ttl_output: true
Why shared defaults matter
A full migration away from stimulus.square would make configs verbose when channels share the same waveform. Shared defaults with per-channel overrides keeps common cases compact while still supporting asymmetric channels.
Questions to answer
- Which fields should be overrideable per channel: only
period_msandtime_on_ms, or the full square/sequence set? - Should
ttl_outputbe allowed per channel, or remain global? - How should merge precedence work between
stimulus.pulse.*,stimulus.square.*, and per-channel overrides? - Should preflight/live UI display both effective shared defaults and per-channel resolved values?
- How much test/config churn would this introduce relative to the value it adds?
Expected scope if we choose to do it later
typed_config.py: channel schema + merge/validation logicdoric_light_source.py: per-channel hardware settings structurehardware_setup.py,stim_controller.py: build resolved per-channel settingspreflight_ui.py,console_display.py: show resolved per-channel pulse settings- tests and config overlays
Current decision
Keep current behavior for now. Use this issue to decide whether the design is worth the added complexity before implementation starts.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading typed_config.py and the current tests and config overlays to trace how stimulus.pulse, stimulus.square, and channel settings are validated and combined. Then inspect doric_light_source.py, hardware_setup.py, stim_controller.py, preflight_ui.py, and console_display.py to map the affected paths. Done means documenting the override scope, precedence, UI impact, and estimated test/config churn, with a recommendation on whether to proceed.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- embedded-iot
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100