mathiasbynens / mathiasbynens/punycode.js
Doesn't support RFC 5895
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 1.7k
- Forks
- 170
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
5895 seems to be the most up-to-date spec, and this doesn't seem to support the deviations listed here: https://unicode.org/reports/tr46/#Deviations .
Was wondering if there were plans to support this, or if I need to figure something else out. (Seems like this is the recommended way to do punycode for node)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by comparing the project's stated RFC 3492 and RFC 5891 compliance with RFC 5895 and the Unicode TR46 deviations linked in the issue. Check the existing punycode.js behavior against those deviations and define completion as supporting the applicable deviations with verification for each affected case.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- javascript
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100