`bal` command doesn't respect depth flag.

System Information

Version:  v0.2.1-modified

System: windows/amd64

Go:  go1.24.4

Source Revision:  13b98d45f12ecc3abf90ea2250bdd471d0692b3c

## What did you do?
I tried to use the balance command with a depth deeper than 1.

## What did you expect to happen?

I expected to see a deep tree of balances.

## What actually happened?

I saw just the normal default 1 level of balance.

Start by locating the Go entry point for the `bal`/balance command and trace how its depth flag is parsed and applied. Reproduce the report with a depth greater than 1; done means the command displays a balance tree deeper than the default one level.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.