Conventions for annotation_rules?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 27
- Forks
- 3
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Since #1 is putting us on the path toward re-importing all the existing datasets, we may want to settle on some conventions for the annotation_rules field in AnnotationMetadata.
I'm mainly thinking of tagging data, where there are a few modes of annotation that are common (strong vs weak, positive-only, etc.) Maybe other tasks also have a small set of standard conventions that we can list out here and use in the parse scripts?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review issue #1's re-import plan, the AnnotationMetadata model, and the existing parse scripts. Identify the common annotation modes that need conventions for annotation_rules, then define the standard set and confirm how the parse scripts should apply them. Done means the conventions are agreed and their intended use in parsing is documented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- data-engineering
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100