markbates / markbates/cover_me
Coverage results inconsistent unless I delete old data
- Dominant language
- Ruby
- Stars
- 203
- Forks
- 17
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I have seen coverage reported as much as three percent higher if I re-run cover_me without deleting the previous data in the tmp/coverage/\* and coverage.data. A related symptom is that sorting on the number of untested lines of code does not work properly unless I delete the previous data.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by reproducing the issue with cover_me, first retaining and then deleting tmp/coverage/* and coverage.data. Inspect how those paths are read or updated; done means repeated runs report consistent coverage and sorting by untested lines works without manually deleting prior data.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- ruby
- Domain
- testing-qa
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100