markbates / markbates/coffeebeans
mention coffee-rails plugin in README
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Ruby
- Stars
- 228
- Forks
- 5
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hi,
perhaps in the README you should mention the fact that this gem's functionality [has been also added](https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/1130#issuecomment-1810606) to the [coffee-rails gem](https://github.com/rails/coffee-rails) (which is included in rails by default now)? I've just successfully tested it, one only has to move the coffee-rails gem out of the assets group in Gemfile.
Many thanks for your lifesaving gem anyway!
Matous
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the README and the linked coffee-rails gem context. Update the README to mention that the gem's functionality is also available through coffee-rails, including the note about moving it out of the assets group; the documentation should clearly describe this relationship.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- coffeescript, rails, ruby
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100