mapbox / mapbox/vector-tile-spec

Extension for per-node attributes

Open
#93 6 comments 3 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

3.0 Specification
Dominant language
No language data
Stars
1k
Forks
213
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

It would sometimes be useful to have per-node attributes within a LineString, MultiLineString, Polygon, or MultiPolygon feature, for example to link these nodes back to the OSM IDs that they came from.

I'm thinking this could look in GeoJSON something like this:

{ "type": "Feature", "properties": { ... }, "geometry": " { ... },
  "linear-attributes": [ null, null, { "node": 12345 }, { "node": 56789, "way": 66 }, null, { "node": 55 }, null ] }

where there the linear-attributes array has the same structure as the geometry.coordinates array, and each element is either null if there is no attribute, or a set of key-value pairs if there are attributes. (Or some other syntax if anybody has any better idea.)

In the vector tile, it could be part of the Feature:

repeated sint linear_attributes = 5 [ packed = true ];

where each positive number represents a key or value in the layer attributes, like in the keys, and each negative number represents (forward) motion through the geometry, so the above would be encoded as:

-2 (move 2),
0 (node), 0 (12345), -1 (move 1),
0 (node), 1 (56789), 1 (way), 2 (66), -2 (move 2),
0 (node), 3 (55), -2 (move 2)

Alternately we could define new geometry types where each position contains x and y coordinates followed by a count of attributes and a set of key-value references, since the parallel arrays might be awkward to maintain.

Any opinions on this idea?

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Review the proposed GeoJSON linear-attributes structure and the vector-tile linear_attributes encoding described in the issue. Compare the alternatives and determine whether the specification has enough consensus to define a concrete extension; done would require an agreed design rather than only an implementation preference.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
data, documentation
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.