Use raster-tester for image comparison
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 2
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Because `SLIC` is randomly seeded, we'll see _slight_ variations in outputs at the pixel level. We should use `raster-tester compare` (https://github.com/mapbox/raster-tester) to compare, as it allows for down / upsampled comparison + comparison within a threshold.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the image-comparison tests or commands that currently compare SLIC outputs, then review the raster-tester compare documentation. Replace the pixel-level comparison with raster-tester using an appropriate threshold, and verify that the comparisons tolerate the slight variations caused by random SLIC seeding.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- computer-vision, testing-qa
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 42/100