Turn Ask Mantosh knowledge-gap telemetry into a publication backlog

Priority: Medium

Problem

Ask Mantosh already records privacy-safe aggregate signals about coverage and knowledge gaps, but those signals are not yet an operational input into what should be published or strengthened next.

Goal

Create a repeatable, privacy-preserving workflow that turns aggregate Ask Mantosh coverage gaps into evidence-backed publication or knowledge-maintenance work.

Scope

• Inventory the aggregate telemetry already available for unsupported, weak-coverage, or fallback outcomes.
• Define thresholds for when a repeated gap deserves review rather than reacting to one-off traffic.
• Map meaningful gaps to one of: improve an existing knowledge source, publish a new Insight, strengthen a Project case study, update Experience/Resume evidence, or explicitly keep the topic unsupported.
• Keep raw visitor question text out of storage/reporting.
• Produce a lightweight recurring report or review artifact that can feed the Personal Platform Evolution backlog.
• Avoid optimizing for generic chatbot breadth; only gaps relevant to Mantosh's published engineering work and professional fit should create work.

Acceptance criteria

• Existing privacy-safe gap/coverage signals are documented and usable.
• A repeatable review process converts meaningful gaps into explicit publication/knowledge decisions.
• One-off or unrelated questions do not create noisy backlog work.
• No raw visitor question text or unnecessary personal data is stored for this workflow.
• Resulting work can be traced back to an aggregate signal without exposing visitor content.
• Publishing documentation identifies this telemetry as one input, not the sole authority, for future content.

No files, tests, or implementation entry points are identified. Start by inventorying the existing privacy-safe aggregate Ask Mantosh coverage signals, then define thresholds, review decisions, and a recurring artifact that feeds the Personal Platform Evolution backlog. Done means meaningful gaps produce traceable publication or knowledge-maintenance decisions without storing raw visitor questions or treating telemetry as the sole authority.