mandiant / mandiant/capa

question: should static function scope and below matching be restricted to executable code sections

Open
#2,915 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

question
Dominant language
Python
Stars
6.2k
Forks
726
Avg merge
11d 11h
Merged PRs (30d)
7

Description

see https://github.com/mandiant/capa/pull/2908 for context. First, initial research must be competed to understand if this issue (capa matching capabilities in non-executable sections of well-formed supported file formats) is prevalent, and therefore worth addressing.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reviewing PR #2908 for the context behind this question. Research whether capa matching in non-executable sections occurs across well-formed supported file formats, then document how prevalent it is and whether restricting static function scope and below matching is worth addressing.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
reverse-engineering
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.