mandiant / mandiant/capa-rules
restrict to `os: android`? or maybe the name and API namespace are sufficient?
Open
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 736
- Forks
- 245
- Avg merge
- 4d 53m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
restrict to `os: android`? or maybe the name and API namespace are sufficient?
we'll have to come up with a consistent style on things like this. i don't know today.
_Originally posted by @williballenthin in https://github.com/mandiant/capa-rules/pull/824#discussion_r1315200173_
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start with the discussion quoted from pull request #824, especially the question about restricting rules to os: android versus relying on the name and API namespace. Establish a consistent style for this case and record the decision in the relevant rule changes; done means the restriction policy is agreed and applied consistently.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- android
- Domain
- mobile-dev
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100