manaflow-ai / manaflow-ai/codex-cua

Establish contribution governance before enabling CLA enforcement

Open
#2 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
5
Forks
1
Avg merge
7h 50m
Merged PRs (30d)
1

Description

PR #1 adds CLA enforcement, but repository evidence does not yet show an explicit external contribution path. The README has no contribution instructions, there is no CONTRIBUTING.md, SECURITY.md, or CI workflow, main is not protected, and the only current contributor is the repository owner. The MIT LICENSE is present.

Before merging PR #1 or making its CLA check required:

  1. Confirm in README or CONTRIBUTING.md that external contributions are accepted, and document review, test, and CLA steps.
  2. Add CI for python3 -m unittest discover -s tests and document the required checks.
  3. Add SECURITY.md with a vulnerability reporting contact.
  4. Protect main and the cla-signatures branch, then run a smoke test for signing, refresh, and merge-lock behavior.
  5. Confirm the legal owner and the CLA document version.

Keep PR #1 open until these prerequisites are complete. Do not add a new license or silently enforce a CLA without owner confirmation.

Please name at least two maintainers who will review security and CLA changes.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the README, then check whether CONTRIBUTING.md, SECURITY.md, and a CI workflow exist. Run python3 -m unittest discover -s tests and review the requested signing, refresh, and merge-lock smoke tests. Done means contribution, review, test, CLA, security-reporting, required-check, branch-protection, and ownership requirements are documented and confirmed by maintainers.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
github, github-actions, python
Domain
ci-cd, devops, documentation, security
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.