Including userscript in IA package will not work

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Hi,

Not sure if it should be a priority to do anything with this, or just add as a NB to the documentation.

This will not work, scenario 1:

```
{
"file": "/Library/installapplications/userscripts/depnotify_user_launcher.py",
"hash": "sha256_hash_goes_here",
"name": "DEPNotify User Launcher",
"type": "userscript"
}
```

This will work, scenario 2:

```
{
"file": "/Library/installapplications/userscripts/depnotify_user_launcher.py",
"hash": "sha256_hash_goes_here",
"name": "DEPNotify User Launcher",
"type": "userscript",
"url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/erikng/installapplicationsdemo/master/installapplications/scripts/user/depnotify_user_launcher.py"
}
```

The difference is that in scenario 1, everything is included in the InstallApplication.pkg, in scenario 2, it is downloaded from the Internet.

In scenario 1, the userscripts folder does exist at the time installapplications.py is checking for existance of needed folders (lines: 474-479), which will bypass the creation of the folder /var/tmp/installapplications (which again is needed for /var/tmp/installapplications/.userscript).

K

Start in installapplications.py around lines 474-479 and reproduce both userscript package scenarios described in the issue. Check why the bundled userscripts directory prevents creation of /var/tmp/installapplications and its .userscript marker. Done should be agreed with maintainers as either making the bundled scenario work or documenting the limitation.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.