How to reproduce the evaluation score in the paper.
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 5.1k
- Forks
- 724
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I'm trying to get the score in the table in paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/1507.08439.pdf. But I found that current model performs a lot better. Is it because the hyperparameters are fine-tunned or I didn't write the right script to get scores.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the evaluation description and table in the linked paper, then compare them with the current model's scoring procedure and hyperparameters. Done means documenting the steps needed to reproduce the paper's score or clearly identifying why the current model produces a different result.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100