Question: What happens if a meta-data feature is specific for a single item or user?
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 5.1k
- Forks
- 724
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hi!
I have a question about a sentence contained in [LigtFM paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1507.08439.pdf):
> If the feature sets also contain meta-data features **shared by more than one item or user**, LightFM extends the MF model by letting the feature latent factors explain part of the structure of user interactions.
What happens if a meta-data feature is specific for a single item or user?
Let's suppose for example to have _10 movies, 4 comedies, 5 horror, and 1 action_ and some users (with no metadata for simplicity) that interact with them.
Shall I encode _action_ feature even it is specific of a single movie [method 1] or shall I drop that level and encode only _comedy_ and _horror_ [method 2]?
method 1:
`dataset.create_item_features({(1, ['comedy']), (2, ['comedy']), (3, ['comedy']), (4, ['comedy']), (5, ['horror']), (6, ['horror']), (7, ['horror']), (8, ['horror']), (9, ['horror']), (10, ['action'])})`
method 2:
`dataset.create_item_features({(1, ['comedy']), (2, ['comedy']), (3, ['comedy']), (4, ['comedy']), (5, ['horror']), (6, ['horror']), (7, ['horror']), (8, ['horror']), (9, ['horror'])})`
Many thanks
Ilaria
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start with the linked LightFM paper and the Dataset.create_item_features examples in the issue. Done means turning the behavior for a feature used by one item or user into a clear project answer or documentation note; no implementation target is named.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100