lxtGH / lxtGH/CAE

Request for clarification on implementation

Open
#10 5 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
198
Forks
21
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Hi, after reading your paper and studying the code, I don't understand why VisionTransformerForMaskedImageModeling have two implementations of the encoder (respectively encoder and teacher model). Why is it not possible to use just the encoder (since it seems they both have the same parameters)?

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Read the paper and the VisionTransformerForMaskedImageModeling implementation, then trace the encoder and teacher model definitions and their parameter relationships. Done means documenting why both implementations exist or clarifying whether the issue requests a code change; the payload names no files or tests.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python, pytorch
Domain
machine-learning
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.