luckyframework / luckyframework/avram
SchemaEnforcer doesn't know about views
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
bug
- Dominant language
- Crystal
- Stars
- 183
- Forks
- 67
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
If you have a view or materialzed view, and then create a model where the table is that view, the SchemaEnforcer throws the error that the table is missing.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start at SchemaEnforcer and reproduce the case described: a model whose table is a view or materialized view. Done means the enforcer no longer reports the view-backed table as missing, with behavior checked for both view types.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- crystal, postgresql
- Domain
- database
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100