lowRISC / lowRISC/style-guides
Scope of this style guide and questions
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 541
- Forks
- 132
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hi,
I've been working on SystemVerilog Style Guide for my company with my colleagues.
I found your style guide and it is very well written. The goal of your stile guide and ours are very close, because we are also referring to books and papers by Stuart Sutherland, Don Mills, and Clifford Cumming as your Style Guide is.
I have some feedbacks and some proposals on your style guide.
Is your style guide only for lowRISC project?
I think your style guide can be applied to wide range of projects. If you don't mind I'd like to send pull requests to you.
Here is my fixes ready to be push.
https://github.com/lowRISC/style-guides/compare/master...hirooih:master
I have some other proposals. Some of them need Q&A with you. Some needs discussion on a separate issue ticket.
Before going to further let me know your thoughts.
Thank you sharing your great style guide.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named. Read the repository's SystemVerilog style guide and the linked comparison, then clarify the guide's intended scope with maintainers before turning any agreed proposals into separate, well-defined changes.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100