[FPGA] cw310 vs cw340
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- SystemVerilog
- Stars
- 3.6k
- Forks
- 1.1k
- Avg merge
- 2d 22h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 141
Description
### Description
Hello,
I'm looking into purchasing one of the OpenTitan FPGA boards and I was hoping to get more information about the two boards and some reasons to opt for the cw340 over the cw310 (w/ 410T). As far as I understand, the cw310's main limitation is that it may not be able to emulate earlgrey entirely (as of https://github.com/lowRISC/opentitan/issues/17166, that didn't sound like a big problem). Are there any other advantages to the cw340 I should take into consideration? For context, my goal is to emulate earlgrey (ideally entirely but okay with mostly), with an added peripheral in the future.
Thanks!
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Begin with the referenced issue #17166 and the stated cw310, cw340, and Earlgrey goals; the payload names no files or tests. A useful outcome would document the relevant board differences, Earlgrey emulation limitations, and implications for adding a peripheral.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- embedded-iot
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100