lowRISC / lowRISC/opentitan

[chip-test] chip_sw_lc_ctrl_debug_access

Open
#20,441 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Component:ChipLevelTest
Dominant language
SystemVerilog
Stars
3.6k
Forks
1.1k
Avg merge
2d 22h
Merged PRs (30d)
141

Description

Test point name

chip_sw_lc_ctrl_debug_access

Host side component

Rust

OpenTitanTool infrastructure implemented

Yes

Silicon Validation (SiVal)

Yes

Emulation Targets
  • None
  • CW310
  • Hyperdebug + CW310
Contact person

No response

Checklist

Please fill out this checklist as items are completed. Link to PRs and issues as appropriate.

  • Check if existing test covers most or all of this testpoint (if so, either extend said test to cover all points, or skip the next 3 checkboxes)
  • Device-side (C) component developed
  • Bazel build rules developed
  • Host-side component developed
  • HJSON test plan updated with test name (so it shows up in the dashboard)
  • Test added to dvsim nightly regression (and passing at time of checking)
  • For SiVal test cases, test is running relevant FPGA or silicon regression

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start at the chip-test entry for chip_sw_lc_ctrl_debug_access and check whether an existing test already covers most of the test point. Then use the checklist to identify the required device-side, Bazel, Rust host-side, HJSON, nightly regression, and SiVal work. Done means the test is implemented for CW310 and all applicable checklist items are complete.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
rust
Domain
embedded-iot, testing-qa
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.