lowRISC / lowRISC/opentitan

[alerts] Need for fast-track analog alerts

Open
#14,833 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Component:RTL Component:Security Earlgrey-PROD Triaged IP:alert_handler Priority:P2 Type:FutureRelease
Dominant language
SystemVerilog
Stars
3.6k
Forks
1.1k
Avg merge
2d 22h
Merged PRs (30d)
141

Description

This is a note that we should at some point have a discussion whether there is a need for additional fast track alerts that completely side-step the current alert subsystem.

I.e., the current alert subsystem is still sequential in nature, and even for critical alert events that are configured to escalate ASAP, it still takes a few cycles until an escalation action is triggered.

Fast-track asynchronous escalation paths could be used to address this issue, but these would have to be inserted manually for a specific small subset of critical alerts conditions.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. First clarify which critical alert conditions and escalation paths are in scope, then define how completion would be evaluated before implementation.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
security
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.