benchmark against redbean?

Hi,

interesting project. How does it compare to https://redbean.dev/ which claims to be very fast, too?

I would be interested in benchmarks, due to this claim of
https://github.com/jart/cosmopolitan/blob/master/tool/net/help.txt#L15:

"redbean can serve 1 million+ gzip encoded responses per second on a
cheap personal computer. That performance is thanks to zip and gzip
using the same compression format, which enables kernelspace copies.
Another reason redbean goes fast is that it's a tiny static binary,
which makes fork memory paging nearly free."

It seems to me there is some overlap of ideas here - serving directly from. ZIP archive vs tar - but the performance figures of zeroserve are lower at face value.

How about a fair benchmark that directly compares with an optlinux-compiled version of redbean on multi-core hardware.

Cheers, Markus

Start by reviewing zeroserve's existing benchmark entry points, if any, and the server's HTTPS serving path. Compare it with an optlinux-compiled redbean build on multi-core hardware using a fair workload, then document the setup and comparative results.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.